Selection Sunday and the BCS, Laughing Stock in the Sports World
The aftermath of Saturday, December 6, 2003 left a nation of college football fans unable to sleep. The top three teams all have one loss. Who is going to play in the Sugar Bowl?
As Selection Sunday came upon us, it is unveiled that the University of Southern California Trojans are ranked number one by both the Associated Press and the ESPN/Coaches Poll. However, they are number three in the Bowl Championship Series Poll, trailing Oklahoma University and Louisiana State University who are going to play in the Sugar Bowl for the BCS Championship.
The fact that USC was jumped again (they were jumped by Ohio State for the 2nd spot three weeks ago before OSU lost to Michigan) only added to my frustration. The loss by Oklahoma on Saturday eliminated Texas (my alma mater) from going to a BCS bowl game, and Tennessee (the team I worshipped as a kid) was edged by Ohio State for a BCS bowl game. The three teams I am in love with were all screwed by the BCS!
Once my initial reactions settled down, I thought about the present scenario. After all, USC might be sitting in the catbird seat! Let’s think about USC’s circumstances.
First, USC is ranked number one in both polls. Although not unanimous, if USC wins big against Michigan while LSU and Oklahoma get into a tight game, USC will certainly remain at the top of both polls which will give USC the AP National Championship title.
Second, USC is playing twenty miles from their campus. Their fans will definitely outnumber Wolverine fans and create a hostile environment for Michigan. I would prefer this over traveling half way across the nation to face either LSU or Oklahoma. Besides, playing in New Orleans around New Years is like holding Mass at a burlesque house. Believe me, I’ve been to New Orleans (mmmm, hand grenades!!), the place is a blast for the fans, but I wouldn’t want my team’s players in that environment before the biggest game of their careers.
Third, USC is literally playing a national championship game against a beatable Michigan team. I would rather face Michigan than an angry Oklahoma team whose got much to prove after the blowout by Kansas State or a LSU team who’s probably playing the best defense in the country. The only time Michigan played west of the Rockies, Oregon beat them 31-27 by holding the Wolverines to -3 yards rushing. I expect a much more superior USC defense to put up comparable numbers. However, it is USC’s offense against Michigan’s defense that’s getting me salivating. Michigan’s defense gave up 495 yards to Minnesota, 383 to Ohio State, and 368 to Central Michigan.
Fourth, Michigan would have had 39 days of rest by the time of the Rose Bowl compared to USC’s 25 days. The long layoff would definitely throw Michigan off sync for at least the first quarter. By that time, the scoreboard might already be 21-0 given USC’s quick-striking offense. Both Oklahoma and LSU will be playing on 28 days of rest.
Finally, I don’t really think an injustice has been done in USC not playing in the Sugar Bowl. I agree with what Coach Pete Carroll said, “when you lose a game, you put your destiny in other people’s hands”. Considering USC lost to an unranked California team, I really don’t believe we have the strongest argument. But then again, LSU lost to a 3-3 Florida team at home and Oklahoma didn’t even win their own conference.
So, after five years of dodging bullets and avoiding catastrophic controversies, the BCS finally blows up by not having the number one team in the polls play in the championship game. Until the birth of a playoff system, USC might just have to hope for a “Paper Champions” tag from the AP this season.